Ranting Kenya

I only bring this up because recently I heard somebody actually say that “Yes, this is HD, but my good Monster cables are downstairs and I should hook them up.” Here’s the real deal. There is no, let me repeat, NO benefit to using Monster (or any other “high end” brand) cables. Engadget reported that users couldn’t “see the monster difference” when the cables were compared to a coat hanger. Here’s the link for Audiophiles can’t tell the difference between Monster Cable and coat hangers.

I don’t really watch a whole lot of TV programs anymore. I used to watch 2 to 3 shows every weekday night. Now, I consistently watch Lost. This is the only show where I freak out about missing an episode. I frequently watch Star Trek reruns, but I don’t care if I miss an episode because I’ve seen them all 5 times anyway. I watch The Office if at all possible. I catch a good amount of reruns Family Guy, American Dad, and Southpark. Then I watch sports.

Now aside from my many complaints about Shaw’s HD-PVR (the same as Comcast’s HD-PVR, that horrible Motorola box), and my complaints about my inability to get HD (or digital) channels on my Windows Media Center computer (i.e. The “Canada and the cablecard” issue and Shaw’s (my cable provider) encryption of digital and HD channels), I’m still going to rant about something else. Watching TV shows online.

On March 24, Gizmodo reported that all the Southpark episodes are online legally. Sweet. That adds to Hulu.com’s great content and implementation (from what I hear), and also ABC’s online episode viewer.

There’s really only one big problem for me, and my fellow non-Americans… NOT AVAILABLE IN OUTSIDE THE US! I understand that us Canadians (and other countries, but I will speak from a Canadian perspective) have different laws, and different content agreements. But seriously, these shows are already available in Canada. They are, legally. I can already see all of them on my 50 inch television. They’re on all the time, plus with my PVR (or my media center computer) I can watch them whenever. I even skip the commercials *gasp*. I can download them “illegally” from a torrent site and watch them all that way, without commercials. I can goto Blockbuster and rent and entire season on DVD for a fraction of the cost of buying (or even paying for cable/satelite), and even duplicate the discs (I don’t do this, but there are plenty of people that do).

Now imagine if I could just watch them when I want, online from the network’s website. As with the Southpark implementation, you’re forced to watch a couple quick ads, so the ads will be played (unlike with the torrents, PVR recordings or DVDs). I don’t have to worry about missing episodes, I can’t download and keep them forever (nor do I need to since they’re available day or night online), I’m not blowing as much bandwidth as downloading/uploading torrent files, I don’t need to “hide” from the authorities, the networks can actually gather viewer statistics about how popular their shows actually are, they can pilot an infinite numbers shows and keep them available (let’s face it, content is their real issue, not piracy), the networks can reach their viewers more consistantly, they can reach a greater audience and word of mouth can now spread wider and faster (you know all that social phenomenon… facebook and all). What’s better that TiVo’s recommendation feature? How about “Your Friends Recommend”? In fact, it’s a win win solution for everyone.

Now I know I can use a US proxy server, but so far, I’ve had little usable success. I’m going to try a few different methods in the next couple weeks, so perhaps I’ll update this post. But I shouldn’t have to work around these types of issues. This is all content that we all have access to already, this is mearly another delivery method. My only hope is that the South Park Studios changes their “Coming Soon” image to some great laughs soon.

Must be a typo right? Although I haven’t played Halo 3 since Orange Box came out.

LIVE Activity for week of 1/14Xbox 360 Top Live Titles (based on UU’s)
1 Call of Duty 4
2 Halo 3
3 Guitar Hero III
4 Gears of War
5 Rock Band
6 Madden NFL 08
7 Assassin’s Creed
8 Mass Effect
9 FIFA 08
10 Forza Motorsport 2

LIVE Activity for week of 1/14 - Xbox Live’s Major Nelson

Tags: xbox, xbox 360, video games, gaming,

I was just checking out some upcoming PC games on the Best Buy Canada website, and look what I found. Spore.

According to this page, August 31 of 2008 is the big day for this game. Most sites I’ve check have it listed as TBA 2008 or Q2 2008.

Now that the music industry is allowing it’s content go out DRM-free, the music battle is more or less over. I believe that soon, music will be avaiable from all the major labels on all the major services. Apple pioneered the industry, Amazon was the first to fully nail it (in my opinion), and now there’s a baseline from which to judge the rest.

But what about video?

Well, the newest player out there (as of yesteday) is Apple. They started the music revolution (or was that Napster?), and now they look to duplicate that success for movies.

There’s another gorilla out there too, Microsoft (have you heard of them). They’ve been doing this for a while now on Xbox.

Amazon has their unbox service, which has already gone through some major revisions.

Aren’t we on the tail end of a format war right now?

So what’s the deal with all these services? From what I can tell, here is the list of similarities between them:

• They all use some form of DRM.
• They all work on different devices.
• They’re all rental services.
• They’re all unique, just like all the others.

So here are my quick thoughts on each service:

Apple

Pros

• Apple’s biggest advantage is that it’s Apple. Their computers continue to sell, iPods are huge, iPhones are even bigger. They have a highly desirable brand in the public consciousness.
• In a close second place, it’s next biggest advantage is that they have all major movie studios onboard. That’s better than the iTunes music store, and a great place to start.
• The quality of the HD video that Steve Jobs outlined sounded excellent. Finally the Apple TV will have some HD content, and also 5.1 digital audio.
• You can rent your movies through the simplicity of iTunes, or another excellent Apple interface via the Apple TV that you access from your couch.

Cons

• However, unlike the iTunes music store, Apple will have a much harder time since other companies are working on the digital delivery model too. iTunes was revolutionary, but others have seen the virtues of Apple’s product and business models.
• Media companies are getting more savvy, and more wary of Steve Jobs. Many feel that he unfairly compensated the recording industry with his low prices. He has been hailed for negotiating some of the most lucrative business deal for his own company (hello AT&T and the iPhone).
• Another problem, you have to purchase an Apple TV to enjoy these videos from your couch. Another couple hundred dollar investment.
• Figuring out what you can do with these videos is also a problem (but not unique to Apple). Here’s an example from Engadget.

Microsoft - Xbox Live

Pros

• Microsoft’s biggest advantage is probably that there is already 10 million Xbox 360 consoles in the wild. As far as getting content from the net to the TV with some propietary box, Xbox 360 is way out front.
• Similarily, they’ve already been selling videos (both HD and SD) on their service for well over a year now. In the Xbox 360 vs PS3 battle, a headstart is clearly a big advatage to have.
• An Xbox 360 console does far more than an Apple TV. It’s not a dedicated media extender/set-top box/service. It plays games, plays HD-DVD (with appropriate attachment), plays DVDs, and a whole lot of other stuff.
• As much as it doesn’t hurt to be Apple, it doesn’t hurt to be Microsoft. They’re huge, they got fingers everywhere, they have excellent technology, huge amounts of cash, and they’ll be in the for the long haul no matter what.
• Xbox 360s, when connected correctly, can upconvert it’s output to 1080p. This is a minor destinction to most, but not all.

Cons

• However, Microsoft lacks full studio support. Content is clearly king.
• You need to have an Xbox 360 console, and it’s more money than an Apple TV.
• You have to use these “Xbox points“. And it’s not a 1:1 ratio with real money. And you have to buy them in bulk. They’re annoying.

Amazon

Pros

• TiVo integration. What could be better than having your videos already waiting for you on your TiVo?
• Amazon got music right. Low prices, DRM-free, huge collection.
• They also have a working video service right now. As far as I know it’s PC only, but they’re in the game.
• I also think that Amazon has some unique possibilities regarding sales. They could sell you the DVD copy, while allowing you to rent or buy a digital copy that you can watch before the DVD arrives in the mail. This also eliminates that whole rental/purchase issue.

Cons

• How do you get it to the TV?
• Doesn’t have the brand recognition in this space of a Microsoft or Apple.
• There is no HD as far as I’m aware.

Final Thoughts

All in all, now that HD-DVD seems to be on its deathbed (at the hands of Blu-Ray), we’re really on the beginning of another “format war” of sorts. How are you supposed to pick between services? Some work with some ipods, some only with specific hardware, all have strict DRM schemes, none of them have anything to do with purchasing content, none inter-operate either.

However, I believe that this is a battle that we can’t afford to sit out. I’m sure if the movie studios see no sales in this digital space, it will delay the roll out of truly good download services by years. Money really is the only motivation that us as consumers can provide for large companies to develop technology and delivery methods that work for us.

This is also essentially the problem the music industry just went through. How do we trust our customers and allow them to enjoy the content they purchase the way they want?

*laughs* Actually, wouldn’t cable card solve a lot of these issues?

It seems that Telus may be set to abandon its ‘Betamax” network and is now ogling the hundreds of millions of dollars in roaming revenue that the GSM carriers enjoy by considering a move to tap into it. Of course, this is merely speculation, but the story does seem to be gaining traction and Rogers shares actually suffered a 2.6 percent drop on this news yesterday. The Olympics are in Vancouver in 2010, we’re thinking if Telus really was going to go for it — and shell out an estimated half billion dollars — that would be a prime time to roll out a hybrid EV-DO / HSDPA network.

CDMA provider contemplating move to GSM: The Telus edition - Engadget

Rogers sales will drop a whole lot more if it’s true. Then Telus could bring the iPhone to Canada.

Tags: telus, mobility, cell, iphone, rogers, wireless

My shiny (literally) new Dell XPS 720 with Windows Vista came yesterday. I got it all running pretty quick, and I’m quite happy with it so far, though I haven’t done too much with it yet. Here are my thoughts.

• The whole 32-bit 4Gb/3Gb RAM issue is rather annoying. Wish I had known about that one ahead of time…
• Who knew the lights of the machine can change colour? Sweet.
• My copy of Civ IV is too old to run on Vista, sigh.
• Company of Heroes is somehow under-rated.
• New Aero Glass interface is pretty slick, maybe too slick, not sure yet.
• A computer case as large as this one, makes a 24-inch widescreen seem kinda small. Maybe the box should go on the floor…
• I want to get a second 8800GT for a SLI configuration, just to see what kind of difference it would make.
• But wouldn’t that compound that stupid RAM issue?!

I know Vista’s not new, but what do other people think?

Also, on a slighly unrelated note… Who would’ve thought that an older linksys usb wireless adapter from 2004 would work flawlessly under Ubuntu for months, and then be totally unusable after 3 minutes on a Win XP machine that it used to work fine on.

Tags: Vista, Dell

Warner actually wanted to go HD DVD. They gave Toshiba the chance to bring another studio into the HD DVD camp before they turned Blu. Fox was lined up, and told the HD DVD camp it was going to switch to HD DVD, which would’ve also turned Warner exclusively HD DVD. At the last possible minute, it nixed the deal.

Lindich says it’s because Fox received a reported $120 million payout from Sony to stay Blu-ray—Warner then switched and received between $400 and $500 million for its defection. BW says it’s closer to $400 million. In our phone call with Warner Kevin Tsujihara said it wasn’t a bidding war that brought them over—that’s true, in the words of Ben Kenobi, from a certain point of view.

Dirty Business: The Real Reason Warner Went Blu-ray

After reading this on Gizmodo, I’m almost mad. I’ve felt that HD-DVD has been superior, I bought an HD-DVD player, I have probably about 8 movies for it. To think that the crushing news of Warner going Blu-Ray was so close to falling on the other side of the fence stings.

Tags: hd-dvd, blu-ray, format, dvd, warner

 In my previous posts regarding Safari on Windows, I was a little underwhelmed. There was no real super feature that made me want to switch. To be honest, I’m too connected to Firefox and all my extensions to leave it on a regular basis anyway. However, I fired up the new update to Safari today. Version 3.0.4. I just wanted to see a couple pages without any cached version available. And I wanted to check my yahoo mail, which for some reason the new version crashes Firefox at my work when you exit it. Anyway, to my amazement, Safari 3 is fast. WAY fast. I was loading fresh pages faster than Firefox was from the cache. I tried different types of pages too. This blog, my portfolio site, digg, Bioware’s website. All loaded so much faster. Not even comparable. It even seems to load pictures faster once they start downloading. On a side note, I had another look at the MacBook Pros the other day. These ones were running Leopard and were brand new. The public hadn’t spoiled them yet. There wasn’t even fingerprints on the screens. Anyway, man, those machines are nice.

I finally got my hands on the iPod Touch at Best Buy the other day. It was a rather impressive device. I didn’t have any headphones, so I didn’t check out sound quality or anything like that.

My first impressions were that the screen was impressive. I have seen posts showing the superior screen of the iPhone, and I could see the iPod Touch’s screen limitation, but it was nevertheless a good looking screen.

The text entry was difficult for me on the narrow screen. The first time I tried to enter a url, everything that was typed from my left thumb was one letter off. I continued typing trying to “trust it” but it was way wrong. The wide keyboard was way easier. I did get better however in a few minutes. Not good, but better.

Scrolling through lists and using coverflow was surprisingly awesome. I was skeptical before, but it’s quite efficient.

But seriously, how awesome is the web browsing on that device. I personally have a Motorola Q. I’ve used Microsoft Deepfish, and the regular IE. Safari on the iPod Touch blows it out of the water so completely, I can’t even compare them. Some of the sites I visited loaded very quickly, others less so. I think the WiFi was a little sketchy in the Best Buy so I’m not convinced that the slowness was necessarily the iPod.

If I had any gripes about it, it would be that moving from some of the applications back to the home screen was sluggish at times, also switching from landscape to portrait or vice versa wasn’t as snappy as I would’ve liked.

All in all, when the iPhone comes to a carrier in Canada that is good (i.e. NOT Rogers), I will seriously consider it based on the iPod Touch. The web browsing alone is enough to sell me. The integration that I’ll be missing (potentially) with my computer and Windows Mobile 5/6 is the lesser evil when compared with the impressive web browsing.